Is it true that Michael Jackson's kids are not really his biologically?

I heard on the news over the weekend that Debbie Rowe was claiming that the kids were not even his. They are really white to be his kids....they do not even look even half black..which they should...right?


Do you think this is true and why would she just now say this?Is it true that Michael Jackson's kids are not really his biologically?
They may not be MJ kids biologically but they are LEGALLY.


In the same way adoption works, officially they are his.


I doubt they are literally.


They do all look too much like what MJ became %26amp; not enough like where he came from.


If you see what I mean.Is it true that Michael Jackson's kids are not really his biologically?
There is your answer....a black man does not make super white children. I know he looked like a white women before he passed away, but that wouldn't carry over into his genes. She is saying it now because publicity would be at a all time high with this. The King of Pop is gone...she is just being a publicity wh*re and that is it. Same as she was when she said she was having his babies.
Rowe claimed she was artificially inseminated by a unknown donor for two of his children. She didn't just say this now this was said several years ago.
I would say it is true. These kids must be totally stuffed in the head...poor buggers. Now it looks like they get to live with the lunatic grandparents. Lucky them.
either way, i hard that jacksons mom is probably gonna get custody of them due to there not being a valid will. there are at least 2 wills, each saying completely opposite things.
His two oldest kids are said to belong to his dermatologist, but I don't know about Blanket
its always been obvious that they are not his children





what normal man want children that arent his ?
she wants them and i have a friend that is spanish her daughter came out white blue eyes
well race doesn't have much to do with it. I'm White and my husband is Mexican our daughter doesn't look white at all